Difference between revisions of "User talk:Kilmarnock"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(why I blocked - how you can return)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
Not even Wikipedia tolerates that kind of abuse. Apologize before asking to come back. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 18:16, 19 June 2008 (EDT)
 
Not even Wikipedia tolerates that kind of abuse. Apologize before asking to come back. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 18:16, 19 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:I have replied on your talk page. And I am shocked at the kind of abuse I have received. In turn, I would expect an apology from you. [[User:Kilmarnock|Kilmarnock]] 18:30, 27 June 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 22:30, June 27, 2008

This edit and removal the you pointed out was not censorship [1], at least not in the way you are thinking of. There are similar edits to this on various other pages, but the last line to this particular posting is something I and many others will not tolerate, which is the insultive rant of an individual who intends to pick a fight. That particular user and his edit was removed from the site. Karajou 01:28, 12 May 2008 (EDT)

'Get a grip' is not an ad hominem attack and further accusations of this kind will be dealt with appropriately. Bugler 16:36, 18 June 2008 (EDT) P.S. MYOB
I have responded on your talk page. Your presupposition is incorrect. Kilmarnock 17:07, 18 June 2008 (EDT)

On the other hand, personal remarks like the following are out of line:

  • how insecure you are
  • you cannot argue against my points like a civilised being

Not even Wikipedia tolerates that kind of abuse. Apologize before asking to come back. --Ed Poor Talk 18:16, 19 June 2008 (EDT)

I have replied on your talk page. And I am shocked at the kind of abuse I have received. In turn, I would expect an apology from you. Kilmarnock 18:30, 27 June 2008 (EDT)