Difference between revisions of "User talk:Argon"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Ha well.  Looks like actual information about Lenski represents "meaningless clutter" on the Lenski page.  Who would have thought it?--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 14:04, 30 June 2008 (EDT)
 
Ha well.  Looks like actual information about Lenski represents "meaningless clutter" on the Lenski page.  Who would have thought it?--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 14:04, 30 June 2008 (EDT)
:Truth may the absolute protection for libel but not being taken seriously and thus being unable of causing damage is also a protection.--[[User:Argon|Argon]] 17:39, 30 June 2008 (EDT)
+
:One can lead a horse to water but one can't make him read the paper.--[[User:Argon|Argon]] 17:39, 30 June 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 21:40, June 30, 2008

Ha well. Looks like actual information about Lenski represents "meaningless clutter" on the Lenski page. Who would have thought it?--British_cons (talk) 14:04, 30 June 2008 (EDT)

One can lead a horse to water but one can't make him read the paper.--Argon 17:39, 30 June 2008 (EDT)