Changes

Richard Lenski is best known for his questionable claim to have observed the [[theory of evolution]] in practice, saying that [[E. coli]] bacteria made minor changes in a long-term laboratory study, and insisting that it was not due to contamination.  The 2008 paper he co-authored was [[peer review]]ed in a mere 14 days, sparking obvious questions<ref>See [[Conservapedia talk:Lenski dialog]].</ref> about the thoroughness of the review.

Richard Lenski is best known for his questionable claim to have observed the [[theory of evolution]] in practice, saying that [[E. coli]] bacteria made minor changes in a long-term laboratory study, and insisting that it was not due to contamination.  The 2008 paper he co-authored was [[peer review]]ed in a mere 14 days, sparking obvious questions<ref>See [[Conservapedia talk:Lenski dialog]].</ref> about the thoroughness of the review.

When challenged, Richard Lenski displayed several examples of irrational [[Professor values|behavior]], thrice referring to the challenges as [[slander]], yet has filed no [[lawsuit]] charging that (or [[libel]]). [[Truth]] offers total legal protection from accusations of libel. He has also displayed annoyance, arrogance, and [[elitism]] when asked to release the information.<ref>See [[Conservapedia:Lenski_dialog#Second_reply|Lenski's second reply to Andrew Schlafly]]</ref>

When challenged, Lenski displayed several examples of irrational [[Professor values|behavior]], thrice referring to the challenges as [[slander]], yet has filed no [[lawsuit]] charging that (or [[libel]]). [[Truth]] offers total legal protection from accusations of libel. He has also displayed annoyance, arrogance, and [[elitism]] when asked to release the information.<ref>See [[Conservapedia:Lenski_dialog#Second_reply|Lenski's second reply to Andrew Schlafly]]</ref>

When Richard Lenski received a public request for the [[data]] underlying for his published claims, he did not provide the actual data even though his study was taxpayer-funded. Lenski's refusal to provide the raw data even to fellow [[Darwinist]]s is telling, and makes it clear that he will not allow his claims to be tested by [[Creation science|open-minded scientists]].

When Richard Lenski received a public request for the [[data]] underlying for his published claims, he did not provide the actual data even though his study was taxpayer-funded. Lenski's refusal to provide the raw data even to fellow [[Darwinist]]s is telling, and makes it clear that he will not allow his claims to be tested by [[Creation science|open-minded scientists]].