137
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Talk:Affirmative Action President (view source)
Revision as of 02:50, July 3, 2008
, 02:50, July 3, 2008no edit summary
==Somebody's Missing Something Here==
I added the following:
However, in the past blacks and women couldn't vote or run for President, and white males did benefit from their race and gender.
And got the following helpful advice:
That really has nothing to do with an Affirmative Action president does it? --TrueValues 19:52, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
Don't continue to reinsert incorrect information. There's never been racial or gender restrictions on becoming president.--Aschlafly 22:25, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
But I'm still unenlightened. I thought what I added was relevant to Conservapedia's definition of an "affirmative action president" as having an advantage based on "race or gender", as stated at the beginning of the article. Also, back when women and blacks couldn't vote, does that mean they could still have a reasonable chance of getting elected? And I thought I knew something about history.[[User:Pluto|Pluto]] 22:50, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
Not racism, not at all. In any case, Barack would be a terrible choice... Remember what happened the last time you elected [[Abraham Lincoln|an Illinois senator with only two years in office]]? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 15:59, 25 January 2008 (EST)
Not racism, not at all. In any case, Barack would be a terrible choice... Remember what happened the last time you elected [[Abraham Lincoln|an Illinois senator with only two years in office]]? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 15:59, 25 January 2008 (EST)