Changes

==Creation Science and the Evolutionary Science Community==

==Creation Science and the Evolutionary Science Community==

Creation science is not accepted by most scientists either in terms of its claims or as a science, on the pretext that it cannot be disproved and therefore cannot be considered "science".<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/19991013122341/http://abcnews.go.com/sections/science/DailyNews/evolutionviews990816.html</ref>  However, Dr. [[Walt Brown]] argues that field of creation science is scientific.<ref>http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/FAQ13.html#wp2727001</ref>  Also, creation scientists say that it is due mainly to the worldviews and preconceptions of the scientists, rather than on the basis of scientific evidence or scientific validity of the idea.<ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/news/scientific_american.asp</ref>

Creation science is not accepted by most scientists either in terms of its claims or as a science, on the pretext that it cannot be disproved and therefore cannot be considered "science".<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/19991013122341/http://abcnews.go.com/sections/science/DailyNews/evolutionviews990816.html</ref>  However, Dr. [[Walt Brown]] argues that field of creation science is scientific.<ref>http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/FAQ13.html#wp2727001</ref>  Also, creation scientists state the evolutionists objections to creation science is due to the worldviews and preconceptions of the scientists, rather than on the basis of scientific evidence or scientific validity of the idea.<ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/news/scientific_american.asp</ref>

Also, [[Karl Popper]], a leading philosopher of science and originator of the falsifiability as a criterion of demarcation of science from nonscience,<ref>

Also, [[Karl Popper]], a leading philosopher of science and originator of the falsifiability as a criterion of demarcation of science from nonscience,<ref>

* http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/popper/

* http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/popper/