Difference between revisions of "Talk:Radioactivity"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(pls add: "random" nature of radioactive decay)
(back to the drawing board, folks)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Implications of [[Quantum mechanics]] should go here, i.e., the "random" nature of radioactive decay. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:57, 8 July 2008 (EDT)
 
Implications of [[Quantum mechanics]] should go here, i.e., the "random" nature of radioactive decay. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:57, 8 July 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
I deleted the page, because it refers to "[[particles]]" in a misleading way. Also, I understand from high school physics that there two kinds of radioactivity:
 +
#Electromagnetic: X-rays, etc.
 +
#Sub-atomic particles, like neutrons; see [[nuclear radiation]]
 +
 +
We need a simple, basic article that explains how your dentist's assistant makes [[X-ray]] pictures of your teeth - and whether it's as dangerous to your reproductive organs as taking a plane trip from NY to LA. It should also explain the [[nuclear reaction]] which generates electricity - and why the US is safer in this than the Soviets were; see [[Chernobyl]]. The basis for [[atomic weapons]] should also be explained.
 +
 +
Other topics include [[background radiation]], [[cosmic rays]], and the medical use of radiation, as in cancer therapy. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:25, 8 July 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 20:25, July 8, 2008

Implications of Quantum mechanics should go here, i.e., the "random" nature of radioactive decay. --Ed Poor Talk 14:57, 8 July 2008 (EDT)

I deleted the page, because it refers to "particles" in a misleading way. Also, I understand from high school physics that there two kinds of radioactivity:

  1. Electromagnetic: X-rays, etc.
  2. Sub-atomic particles, like neutrons; see nuclear radiation

We need a simple, basic article that explains how your dentist's assistant makes X-ray pictures of your teeth - and whether it's as dangerous to your reproductive organs as taking a plane trip from NY to LA. It should also explain the nuclear reaction which generates electricity - and why the US is safer in this than the Soviets were; see Chernobyl. The basis for atomic weapons should also be explained.

Other topics include background radiation, cosmic rays, and the medical use of radiation, as in cancer therapy. --Ed Poor Talk 16:25, 8 July 2008 (EDT)