Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rugby (sport)"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Rugby union)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
The rugby union link just re-directs to Rugby while there is an article on rugby league. Does anyone know if there was an article on rugby union perhaps under a different name that has been orphaned? Otherwise I'll create one. [[User:Ajkgordon|Ajkgordon]] 11:24, 12 October 2007 (EDT)
 
The rugby union link just re-directs to Rugby while there is an article on rugby league. Does anyone know if there was an article on rugby union perhaps under a different name that has been orphaned? Otherwise I'll create one. [[User:Ajkgordon|Ajkgordon]] 11:24, 12 October 2007 (EDT)
 +
:I plan on doing some work on this article now, a nice uncontroversial article I know a lot about.  However I will make the article about rugby union and another one on rugby league.  It is understandable perhaps that a primarily US website would lump the two sports together but its rather silly also.--[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 15:59, 13 July 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 19:59, July 13, 2008

Rugby union

The rugby union link just re-directs to Rugby while there is an article on rugby league. Does anyone know if there was an article on rugby union perhaps under a different name that has been orphaned? Otherwise I'll create one. Ajkgordon 11:24, 12 October 2007 (EDT)

I plan on doing some work on this article now, a nice uncontroversial article I know a lot about. However I will make the article about rugby union and another one on rugby league. It is understandable perhaps that a primarily US website would lump the two sports together but its rather silly also.--DamianJohn 15:59, 13 July 2008 (EDT)