Difference between revisions of "Calabi-Yau"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (bold)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Let <math>M</math> be a Kaehler manifold. Then <math>M</math> is Calabi-Yau if <math>c_1(K_M) = 0</math>. If <math>M</math> is a variety, we say that <math>M</math> is a Calabi-Yau variety if it has vanishing canonical class.
+
Let <math>M</math> be a Kaehler manifold. Then <math>M</math> is '''Calabi-Yau''' if <math>c_1(K_M) = 0</math>. If <math>M</math> is a variety, we say that <math>M</math> is a Calabi-Yau variety if it has vanishing canonical class.
  
 
==Examples==
 
==Examples==

Revision as of 22:30, July 30, 2008

Let be a Kaehler manifold. Then is Calabi-Yau if . If is a variety, we say that is a Calabi-Yau variety if it has vanishing canonical class.

Examples

All elliptic curves are Calabi-Yau, since they are parallelizeable.

A degree hypersurface in is Calabi-Yau. For from the exact sequence

we get that . But this implies that

from which one easily concludes that .

Calabi Conjecture

The first Chern class of a Kaehler manifold is homologous to the Ricci curvature. For this reason, Calabi conjectured that when , there existed a metric on the manifold whose Ricci form identically vanished. This, the Calabi-Conjecture, was eventually proven by Shing-Tung Yau.