Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay:Answers to Outrageous Pseudoconservative Statements"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
NewCrusader (talk | contribs) m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Nominated for deletion? Is it taboo to voice disagreement with Rush Limbaugh on Conservapedia? | Nominated for deletion? Is it taboo to voice disagreement with Rush Limbaugh on Conservapedia? | ||
:He is highly influencial with conservatives, and quite respected, but he does sometimes go off the deep end. - [[User:NewCrusader|NewCrusader]] | :He is highly influencial with conservatives, and quite respected, but he does sometimes go off the deep end. - [[User:NewCrusader|NewCrusader]] | ||
| + | :My guess is the smarmy tone and ridiculous introduction is the culprit. I've noticed that you have to try especially hard to appear interested in actual discussion here to be taken seriously. There is so much vandalism and parody that the SysOps have no patience for people just trying to score points against, say, Rush Limbaugh. [[User:TJason|TJason]] 11:56, 13 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:56, August 13, 2008
Nominated for deletion? Is it taboo to voice disagreement with Rush Limbaugh on Conservapedia?
- He is highly influencial with conservatives, and quite respected, but he does sometimes go off the deep end. - NewCrusader
- My guess is the smarmy tone and ridiculous introduction is the culprit. I've noticed that you have to try especially hard to appear interested in actual discussion here to be taken seriously. There is so much vandalism and parody that the SysOps have no patience for people just trying to score points against, say, Rush Limbaugh. TJason 11:56, 13 August 2008 (EDT)