Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay:Title IX Destroys Our Olympic Team"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
What is [[private cause of action]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 19:50, 13 August 2008 (EDT) | What is [[private cause of action]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 19:50, 13 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
| − | I will bet you $500 that if title IX is eliminated, almost all olympians will come from private teams, simply because those programs will get better funding and m,ost schools have loads of nitty gritty regulations about things like saftey. [[User:PastafarianFSM|PastafarianFSM]] 13:33, 14 August 2008 (EDT) | + | I will bet you $500 that if title IX is eliminated, almost all olympians will come from private teams, simply because those programs will get better funding and m,ost schools have loads of nitty gritty regulations about things like saftey. Plus, We lost the olympic gold because one gymnist fell once. Unlucky, but is completely irrelevent. We are currently in the lead with medels. If its been around since the 70s, then why is it only now that our tems are suffering.[[User:PastafarianFSM|PastafarianFSM]] 13:33, 14 August 2008 (EDT) |
Revision as of 17:35, August 14, 2008
Mr. Schlafly, I read your latest essay with great interest. Although I agree with you that Title IX has probably reduced the competitiveness of our Olympic team, I wonder if this is a great enough cost to justify repealing it. I believe that women's sports at the collegiate level have benefited greatly from Title IX, and I wonder if reduced Olympic competitiveness is an acceptable trade-off for this benefit. TJason 16:55, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
What is private cause of action? --Ed Poor Talk 19:50, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
I will bet you $500 that if title IX is eliminated, almost all olympians will come from private teams, simply because those programs will get better funding and m,ost schools have loads of nitty gritty regulations about things like saftey. Plus, We lost the olympic gold because one gymnist fell once. Unlucky, but is completely irrelevent. We are currently in the lead with medels. If its been around since the 70s, then why is it only now that our tems are suffering.PastafarianFSM 13:33, 14 August 2008 (EDT)