Changes

530 bytes added ,  02:12, March 20, 2007
→‎Significant changes to the article: Regarding Cracker's use of disparaging language for a parishioner
Line 83: Line 83:     
:::::From what I recall during my days over to a-r-s Xenu was OT-III material, revealed only after the mark has (donated) spent thousands of dollars. It was in evidence during a trial of one guy named "Fischmann". Sometime between the occurrence of the trial and CoS's attorneys asking the documents be sealed, an enterprising person copied them and distributed them far and wide. Once the order to seal was set ALL these copies were illegal but somehow they managed to get onto the internet. The upshot is that though Xenu is widely known the actual documents are still copyrighted and not allowed to be seen in toto. But, as Groucho Marx pointed out "inside a dog, it's too dar to read. [[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 11:22, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:::::From what I recall during my days over to a-r-s Xenu was OT-III material, revealed only after the mark has (donated) spent thousands of dollars. It was in evidence during a trial of one guy named "Fischmann". Sometime between the occurrence of the trial and CoS's attorneys asking the documents be sealed, an enterprising person copied them and distributed them far and wide. Once the order to seal was set ALL these copies were illegal but somehow they managed to get onto the internet. The upshot is that though Xenu is widely known the actual documents are still copyrighted and not allowed to be seen in toto. But, as Groucho Marx pointed out "inside a dog, it's too dar to read. [[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 11:22, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::: You know what, Cracker?  It really reeks that you would treat freedom of religion with so little respect that you use "mark" to talk about it.  Why can't you speak civilized language, why can't you express your position without using such terms? It is completely obvious that you don't understand what the subject is, that's fine.  But even if you disagree with a person's right to have a freedom of religion, you need not use disrespectful language, for a parishioner. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 22:12, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
    
== Fox News ==
 
== Fox News ==
343

edits