Difference between revisions of "Talk:Freemasonry"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Frankly, most of this info is bunk. It goes on weird, irrelevant tangents, and is biased.--[[User:Adon|Adon]] 03:18, 30 March 2007 (EDT) | Frankly, most of this info is bunk. It goes on weird, irrelevant tangents, and is biased.--[[User:Adon|Adon]] 03:18, 30 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| − | Perhaps at one point but as it stands now it is quite concise and | + | Perhaps at one point but as it stands now it is quite concise and to the point, and might I add the most fair and informative article I've seen on Freemasonry on the internet in a long time. |
[[User:Jros83|Jros83]] 19:36, 19 June 2007 (EDT) | [[User:Jros83|Jros83]] 19:36, 19 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Hmm no, I've changed my mind. It's rather skimpy to be certain.[[User:Jros83|Jros83]] 20:28, 24 August 2008 (EDT) Still though it's nice to see it not being trashed. | ||
Revision as of 00:28, August 25, 2008
Frankly, most of this info is bunk. It goes on weird, irrelevant tangents, and is biased.--Adon 03:18, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
Perhaps at one point but as it stands now it is quite concise and to the point, and might I add the most fair and informative article I've seen on Freemasonry on the internet in a long time. Jros83 19:36, 19 June 2007 (EDT)
- Hmm no, I've changed my mind. It's rather skimpy to be certain.Jros83 20:28, 24 August 2008 (EDT) Still though it's nice to see it not being trashed.