Difference between revisions of "Talk:Derogatory terms"
m (New page: Should mention how the word 'liberal' has become demonizing. Also, why should this article only be about liberal demonizers? I have heard many a conservative demonizers like "tree-hugger...) |
(→Anyone here a college student?: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should mention how the word 'liberal' has become demonizing. Also, why should this article only be about liberal demonizers? I have heard many a conservative demonizers like "tree-hugger" and "evolutionist" (it and the word 'creationist' have too many mean spirited implications when applied to a person).--[[User:Snotbowst|Snotbowst]] 19:35, 15 May 2008 (EDT) | Should mention how the word 'liberal' has become demonizing. Also, why should this article only be about liberal demonizers? I have heard many a conservative demonizers like "tree-hugger" and "evolutionist" (it and the word 'creationist' have too many mean spirited implications when applied to a person).--[[User:Snotbowst|Snotbowst]] 19:35, 15 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Anyone here a college student? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think this article could benefit more from someone who has taken a higher level political science course (only field I can think of that would even come close to seriously investigating this subject, though I suspect it would not be in a direct way) so that they may add a more detailed analysis (they would also have more access to sources) on the subject, provide additional examples, and perhaps add more historical context. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 14:20, 25 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:20, August 25, 2008
Should mention how the word 'liberal' has become demonizing. Also, why should this article only be about liberal demonizers? I have heard many a conservative demonizers like "tree-hugger" and "evolutionist" (it and the word 'creationist' have too many mean spirited implications when applied to a person).--Snotbowst 19:35, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
Anyone here a college student?
I think this article could benefit more from someone who has taken a higher level political science course (only field I can think of that would even come close to seriously investigating this subject, though I suspect it would not be in a direct way) so that they may add a more detailed analysis (they would also have more access to sources) on the subject, provide additional examples, and perhaps add more historical context. Jirby 14:20, 25 August 2008 (EDT)