Difference between revisions of "Talk:Simple eye"
From Conservapedia
(reply) |
m (Spelling) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This really doesn't warrant its own page, and would be much better off as a subsection of [[eye]]. -[[User:DrSandstone|DrSandstone]] 15:21, 27 August 2008 (EDT) | This really doesn't warrant its own page, and would be much better off as a subsection of [[eye]]. -[[User:DrSandstone|DrSandstone]] 15:21, 27 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
| − | :I agree. If you add it as a subsection | + | :I agree. If you add it as a subsection to the eye article, I will delete these pages. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 15:37, 27 August 2008 (EDT) |
Revision as of 19:42, August 27, 2008
This really doesn't warrant its own page, and would be much better off as a subsection of eye. -DrSandstone 15:21, 27 August 2008 (EDT)
- I agree. If you add it as a subsection to the eye article, I will delete these pages. --DeanStalk 15:37, 27 August 2008 (EDT)
