Difference between revisions of "Talk:Freedom fighter"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
British cons (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''Freedom fighters are '''irregular armed forces''' that fight against the '''regular armed forces''' of an occupying power.'' Where did you get that definition? Because I can't find one that is that specific anywhere. [[User:JamesK|JamesK]] 08:50, 14 March 2007 (EDT) | ''Freedom fighters are '''irregular armed forces''' that fight against the '''regular armed forces''' of an occupying power.'' Where did you get that definition? Because I can't find one that is that specific anywhere. [[User:JamesK|JamesK]] 08:50, 14 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | :British and American troops come under attack every day in Iraq. By this definition they are being attacked by freedom fighters. I think a better definition is needed.--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 04:20, 20 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 08:20, March 20, 2007
Freedom fighters are irregular armed forces that fight against the regular armed forces of an occupying power. Where did you get that definition? Because I can't find one that is that specific anywhere. JamesK 08:50, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
- British and American troops come under attack every day in Iraq. By this definition they are being attacked by freedom fighters. I think a better definition is needed.--British_cons (talk) 04:20, 20 March 2007 (EDT)