nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Suppression of alternatives to evolution (view source)
Revision as of 12:43, September 9, 2008
, 12:43, September 9, 2008→Vilification: Tom Mason
* [[Isaac Asimov]] said that all "creationists are stupid, lying people who are not to be trusted in any way." and that all of their "points are equally stupid, except where the creationists are outrightly lying."<ref>Asimov, L., Is Big Brother watching? ''The Humanist'' 44(4):6–10, 1984, quoted by Bergman, 2005</ref>
* [[Isaac Asimov]] said that all "creationists are stupid, lying people who are not to be trusted in any way." and that all of their "points are equally stupid, except where the creationists are outrightly lying."<ref>Asimov, L., Is Big Brother watching? ''The Humanist'' 44(4):6–10, 1984, quoted by Bergman, 2005</ref>
* [[Richard Dawkins]] said that anyone rejecting evolution is "ignorant, stupid or insane (or wicked—but I’d rather not consider that)"<ref>Barnes, 2007</ref>
* [[Richard Dawkins]] said that anyone rejecting evolution is "ignorant, stupid or insane (or wicked—but I’d rather not consider that)"<ref>Barnes, 2007</ref>
* Tom Mason, Director of the [[Armagh]] planetarium, links the creationary view to [[Islam]]ic fundamentalism, the [[Inquisition]], and [[Jihad]], and refers to creationism as "ignorance", "irrationality", and "narrow-minded".<ref>Mason, Tom, Science and Fundamentalism, ''Earth Science Ireland'', issue 3, spring 2008 (available online at [http://www.habitas.org.uk/es2k/], then click on "Newletter" link).</ref>
Creationary [[scientist]]s frequently have their qualifications questioned, blatantly or subtly.
Creationary [[scientist]]s frequently have their qualifications questioned, blatantly or subtly.