Difference between revisions of "Talk:Honored"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Chippeterson (talk | contribs) |
JLauttamus (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I know Foxtrot, but now I loss a contribution that could help me come in first for the top three contributors. [[User:Chippeterson|Chippeterson]] September 12 2008 | I know Foxtrot, but now I loss a contribution that could help me come in first for the top three contributors. [[User:Chippeterson|Chippeterson]] September 12 2008 | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Chip, I think your current contributions speak for themselves. I don't think that's a good enough reason to keep a page that could easily be merged. [[User:LautRN|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:LautRN|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 18:30, 12 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:30, September 12, 2008
This does not deserve it's own page. It should appear as a one line addition to honor. I am returning the redirect but I'll place the relevant info in the honor article. -Foxtrot 18:24, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
I know Foxtrot, but now I loss a contribution that could help me come in first for the top three contributors. Chippeterson September 12 2008
- Chip, I think your current contributions speak for themselves. I don't think that's a good enough reason to keep a page that could easily be merged. Jeffrey W. LauttamusDiscussion 18:30, 12 September 2008 (EDT)