560
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: +
Talk:Essay:Big science (view source)
Revision as of 15:57, September 18, 2008
, 15:57, September 18, 2008no edit summary
I suggest this article be deleted (since it was created to prove a point), moved to essay, or at least renamed. The term "Big science" is already defined. Please read the Britannica article on the subject for its definition and the history of the phrase. We can't just redefine established terms. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 11:53, 18 September 2008 (EDT)
I suggest this article be deleted (since it was created to prove a point), moved to essay, or at least renamed. The term "Big science" is already defined. Please read the Britannica article on the subject for its definition and the history of the phrase. We can't just redefine established terms. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 11:53, 18 September 2008 (EDT)
:'''Delete'''..... Hrm, on second thought, maybe '''move to essay''' with the proper redirects so that nobody in the future gets the bright idea to do it again. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 11:55, 18 September 2008 (EDT)
:'''Delete'''..... Hrm, on second thought, maybe '''move to essay''' with the proper redirects so that nobody in the future gets the bright idea to do it again. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 11:55, 18 September 2008 (EDT)
::I agree with both of you. It's just not encyclopedic, & would take a lot of work to make it even remotely encyclopedic. Delete or move to essay. [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 11:57, 18 September 2008 (EDT)