189
edits
Changes
Talk:Essay:Big science (view source)
Revision as of 19:09, September 18, 2008
, 19:09, September 18, 2008no edit summary
A mention of Conservapedia is way over the top. This is an encyclopedia, not a press release. Also, the statement itself didn't mediate the rest of the article, it attempted to confirm the article's conclusions. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:04, 18 September 2008 (EDT)
A mention of Conservapedia is way over the top. This is an encyclopedia, not a press release. Also, the statement itself didn't mediate the rest of the article, it attempted to confirm the article's conclusions. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:04, 18 September 2008 (EDT)
: I partially agree, which is why ultimately I think moving this to Essay is the best solution (since in that scenario, we can keep the Conservapedia references). --[[User:DRamon|DRamon]] 15:09, 18 September 2008 (EDT)