Difference between revisions of "Talk:Clarence Thomas"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Sexual Allegations: In my opinion, the Hill allegations were disproved) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Sexual Allegations == | == Sexual Allegations == | ||
| + | I just thought I would add the case which made Clarence Thomas famous to the article. I don't know why it wasn't there, after all, this is supposed to be the trustworthy encyclopedia. JSJames 2:00pm (PT) 20 Septmeber 2008 | ||
| − | + | : In my opinion, the Hill allegations were disproved. I would object to including allegations like this unless, at a minimum, the article includes the reasons for thinking that she way lying. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 18:47, 20 September 2008 (EDT) | |
Revision as of 22:47, September 20, 2008
Edited to remove opinion and speculation with no factual evidence cited to support it. Britinme 6:34pm 2 April 2007 (EDT)
Sexual Allegations
I just thought I would add the case which made Clarence Thomas famous to the article. I don't know why it wasn't there, after all, this is supposed to be the trustworthy encyclopedia. JSJames 2:00pm (PT) 20 Septmeber 2008
- In my opinion, the Hill allegations were disproved. I would object to including allegations like this unless, at a minimum, the article includes the reasons for thinking that she way lying. RSchlafly 18:47, 20 September 2008 (EDT)