Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pedophilic priests"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(I favor killing the article) |
JLauttamus (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:I personally met one of these men. He was removed from his leadership position but retained his 'priesthood' and entered treatment. There are 12-step groups for [[sexual addiction]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 20:20, 31 March 2007 (EDT) | :I personally met one of these men. He was removed from his leadership position but retained his 'priesthood' and entered treatment. There are 12-step groups for [[sexual addiction]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 20:20, 31 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| − | I favor killing the article. It is useless. At most, maybe there could be a section in | + | I favor killing the article. It is useless. At most, maybe there could be a section in pedophilia. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 22:09, 31 March 2007 (EDT) |
| + | |||
| + | ==Delete== | ||
| + | Shouldn't this be deleted? [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 17:50, 21 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:50, September 21, 2008
I do agree that the topic is noteworthy. One of the reasons I deleted it was because the word "pedophilic" was misspelled. I suppose I could have moved it. MountainDew 20:12, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
- I personally met one of these men. He was removed from his leadership position but retained his 'priesthood' and entered treatment. There are 12-step groups for sexual addiction. --Ed Poor 20:20, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
I favor killing the article. It is useless. At most, maybe there could be a section in pedophilia. RSchlafly 22:09, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
Delete
Shouldn't this be deleted? Jeffrey W. LauttamusDiscussion 17:50, 21 September 2008 (EDT)