Difference between revisions of "Talk:Public library"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: re: "free" vs. "open" - I removed "free" because it implies "without cost." Taxpayers do pay for libraries. However, I see Karajou's point about access to libraries being open to the pub...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
re: "free" vs. "open" - I removed "free" because it implies "without cost."  Taxpayers do pay for libraries.  However, I see Karajou's point about access to libraries being open to the public.  Hopefully this word is more precise.  [[User:PhilScheur|PhilScheur]] 11:56, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 
re: "free" vs. "open" - I removed "free" because it implies "without cost."  Taxpayers do pay for libraries.  However, I see Karajou's point about access to libraries being open to the public.  Hopefully this word is more precise.  [[User:PhilScheur|PhilScheur]] 11:56, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 +
:Isn't there examples of public libraries which charge a fee for services and/or entry?  I was thinking of that as well when I inserted "free" into it.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 11:58, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 15:58, September 22, 2008

re: "free" vs. "open" - I removed "free" because it implies "without cost." Taxpayers do pay for libraries. However, I see Karajou's point about access to libraries being open to the public. Hopefully this word is more precise. PhilScheur 11:56, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Isn't there examples of public libraries which charge a fee for services and/or entry? I was thinking of that as well when I inserted "free" into it. Karajou 11:58, 22 September 2008 (EDT)