Difference between revisions of "Talk:Follower"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(I noted your comment)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
:I'm sorry Brian, I wasn't being snarky! Not deliberately, at any rate. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 17:22, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 
:I'm sorry Brian, I wasn't being snarky! Not deliberately, at any rate. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 17:22, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 
::Fortunate you are, good sir. I have emphasised the old-fashioned nature of the term. I deliberately added that def. as many pupils might encounter it in literature such the works of Austen, Bronte(s) or even the Mitfords. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 17:23, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 
::Fortunate you are, good sir. I have emphasised the old-fashioned nature of the term. I deliberately added that def. as many pupils might encounter it in literature such the works of Austen, Bronte(s) or even the Mitfords. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 17:23, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 +
:::I pity any 21st century American student (or British, or other, for that matter) who comes up against the Mitfords. What a crew! [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 17:28, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 21:28, September 29, 2008

For myself, I do not permit my female servants to have followers. Bugler 17:18, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

I'm sorry Brian, I wasn't being snarky! Not deliberately, at any rate. Bugler 17:22, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
Fortunate you are, good sir. I have emphasised the old-fashioned nature of the term. I deliberately added that def. as many pupils might encounter it in literature such the works of Austen, Bronte(s) or even the Mitfords. BrianCo 17:23, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
I pity any 21st century American student (or British, or other, for that matter) who comes up against the Mitfords. What a crew! Bugler 17:28, 29 September 2008 (EDT)