Difference between revisions of "User talk:DanielB"

Latest revision as of 19:00, October 5, 2008

It's not me avoiding the question; it is you who are to rephrase it in a more respectful manner. Karajou 23:51, 27 April 2008 (EDT)

Hadn't you better re-phrase...

Laddie, hadn't you better re-phrase this?

Contempt of the administration is one of the oldest blockable offenses in the book. And you've just shown it.--TerryH^Talk 23:05, 6 June 2008 (EDT)

Can you be arrested for showing contept of the president? No contempt for leadership is on of the hallmarks of freedom. DanielB 19:29, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

Quote

Love that Galilleo quote.CraigC 01:22, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

Cheers I rather like it. DanielB 19:28, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

Diagonalization

Moved to Talk:Diagonalization

spelling

Daniel:

There's really no polite way to put this, but could you please use a spell checker for your contributions? By the way, I really do respect many of your contributions. SamHB 22:41, 21 June 2008 (EDT)

SamHB there probably is a polite way of saying this, see the button at the top that says edit, click it. DanielB 22:54, 21 June 2008 (EDT)

He was politely trying to say, "improve your spelling or else you will be mocked eternally" o.O Nate ^{my opinion matters?} 15:00, 5 October 2008 (EDT)

Probation

Daniel, be very careful what advice you give other contributors, especially newbies like User:Lemonpeel. See his talk for my corrections.

You really would be better off checking your notions with me or the project director before spouting off like that. Consider yourself on probation. --Ed Poor ^Talk 20:46, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 ==Diagonalization==
-First, thank you for the full proof of the naturals vs. reals case.
+Moved to [[Talk:Diagonalization]]
-Diagonalization is classically applied to show that the reals are bigger than the natural numbers, but the diagonalization argument also works to take any infinite set and construct a set of larger cardinality (namely the power set).
+== spelling ==
-As for the Diagonalization and God section, this is a valid philosophical argument and has citations to back it up.[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 22:14, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
+Daniel:
-:Okay I might leave the philisophical point, but where is the axiom of choice used in that proof? [[User:DanielB|DanielB]] 22:17, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
+There's really no polite way to put this, but could you please use a spell checker for your contributions?  By the way, I really do respect many of your contributions. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 22:41, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
+:SamHB there probably is a polite way of saying this, see the button at the top that says edit, click it. [[User:DanielB|DanielB]] 22:54, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
+::He was politely trying to say, "improve your spelling or else you will be mocked eternally" o.O [[User:NathanG|Nate]] <sup>[[User_talk:NathanG|my opinion matters?]]</sup> 15:00, 5 October 2008 (EDT)
-::You had to enumerate all the decimal representations of the reals (i.e. well-order them by the natural numbers). There is no natural way to do this without the axiom of choice. [[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 22:25, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
+==Probation==
+Daniel, be very careful what advice you give other contributors, especially newbies like [[User:Lemonpeel]]. See his talk for my corrections.
+You really would be better off '''checking''' your notions with me or the project director before spouting off like that. Consider yourself on probation. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 20:46, 19 August 2008 (EDT)