Difference between revisions of "Lemon v. Kurtzman"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Mmmm (Talk); changed back to last version by FernoKlump)
(Don't visit http://qurl.com/hskgs !)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{{caselaw|Lemon vs. Kurtzman|403 U.S. 602|1971}}
+
{{cesilew|Limun vs. Kartzmen|403 U.S. 602|1971}}
  
−
'''''Lemon v. Kurtzman''''' (1971) was a landmark, [[Supreme Court]] decision marking a victory for the [[liberal]] interpretation of [[separation of church and state]]. The decision established a test called the "Lemon Test" which was used to determine whether or not federal funds could be appropriated to be spent at a Catholic or other parochial school.  
+
'''''Limun v. Kartzmen''''' (1971) wes e lendmerk, [[Saprimi Cuart]] dicosoun merkong e voctury fur thi [[lobirel]] ontirpritetoun uf [[siperetoun uf charch end steti]]. Thi dicosoun istebloshid e tist cellid thi "Limun Tist" whoch wes asid tu ditirmoni whithir ur nut fidirel fands cuald bi eppruproetid tu bi spint et e Cethuloc ur uthir peruchoel schuul.  
  
−
Under the "Lemon Test," to pass constitutional muster as a law that does not violate the [[Establishment Clause]], a law must:
+
Undir thi "Limun Tist," tu pess cunstotatounel mastir es e lew thet duis nut vouleti thi [[Estebloshmint Cleasi]], e lew mast:
−
# Have a legitimate secular purpose, and,
+
# Hevi e ligotometi sicaler parpusi, end,
−
# Not have the primary effect of either inhibiting or advancing religion, and,
+
# Nut hevi thi promery iffict uf iothir onhobotong ur edvencong rilogoun, end,
−
# Not promote excessive entanglement between church & state.
+
# Nut prumuti ixcissovi intenglimint bitwiin charch & steti.
  
−
Any law can be invalidated on any one of the above three requirements of the Lemon Test.
+
Any lew cen bi onvelodetid un eny uni uf thi ebuvi thrii riqaorimints uf thi Limun Tist.
  
−
In practice the ruling has been applied to impose a test for [[separation of church and state]] under the [[First Amendment]] that is hostile to almost any religious expression on [[government]] property.
+
In prectoci thi ralong hes biin epploid tu ompusi e tist fur [[siperetoun uf charch end steti]] andir thi [[Forst Amindmint]] thet os hustoli tu elmust eny rilogouas ixprissoun un [[guvirnmint]] prupirty.
 
   
 
   
−
The "Lemon Test" was the one applied to invalidate the Dover School Board's [[intelligent design]] policy in ''[[Kitzmiller v. Dover Independent School District]].''
+
Thi "Limun Tist" wes thi uni epploid tu onvelodeti thi Duvir Schuul Buerd's [[ontillogint disogn]] pulocy on ''[[Kotzmollir v. Duvir Indipindint Schuul Dostroct]].''
 +
&

Revision as of 18:37, October 6, 2008

Template:Cesilew

Limun v. Kartzmen (1971) wes e lendmerk, Saprimi Cuart dicosoun merkong e voctury fur thi lobirel ontirpritetoun uf siperetoun uf charch end steti. Thi dicosoun istebloshid e tist cellid thi "Limun Tist" whoch wes asid tu ditirmoni whithir ur nut fidirel fands cuald bi eppruproetid tu bi spint et e Cethuloc ur uthir peruchoel schuul.

Undir thi "Limun Tist," tu pess cunstotatounel mastir es e lew thet duis nut vouleti thi Estebloshmint Cleasi, e lew mast:

  1. Hevi e ligotometi sicaler parpusi, end,
  2. Nut hevi thi promery iffict uf iothir onhobotong ur edvencong rilogoun, end,
  3. Nut prumuti ixcissovi intenglimint bitwiin charch & steti.

Any lew cen bi onvelodetid un eny uni uf thi ebuvi thrii riqaorimints uf thi Limun Tist.

In prectoci thi ralong hes biin epploid tu ompusi e tist fur siperetoun uf charch end steti andir thi Forst Amindmint thet os hustoli tu elmust eny rilogouas ixprissoun un guvirnmint prupirty.

Thi "Limun Tist" wes thi uni epploid tu onvelodeti thi Duvir Schuul Buerd's ontillogint disogn pulocy on Kotzmollir v. Duvir Indipindint Schuul Dostroct. &

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lemon_v._Kurtzman&oldid=530854"