Difference between revisions of "Talk:There Are No Atheists In Foxholes"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
What's the point of this, aside from being an ad homenim attack on atheists? [[User:JecklynH|JecklynH]] 02:03, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
 
What's the point of this, aside from being an ad homenim attack on atheists? [[User:JecklynH|JecklynH]] 02:03, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
−
  :That IS the point. [[User:Jros83|Jros83]] 23:41, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
+
  : That IS the point. [[User:Jros83|Jros83]] 23:41, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
  
 
So has anyone ever heard "'There are no atheists in foxholes' is not an argument against atheism, it's an argument against foxholes?'" I love that line (by the way I'm not an atheist). [[User:Jros83|Jros83]] 23:41, 8 October 2008 (EDT) I'm also in the Army...
 
So has anyone ever heard "'There are no atheists in foxholes' is not an argument against atheism, it's an argument against foxholes?'" I love that line (by the way I'm not an atheist). [[User:Jros83|Jros83]] 23:41, 8 October 2008 (EDT) I'm also in the Army...

Revision as of 03:41, October 9, 2008

What's the point of this, aside from being an ad homenim attack on atheists? JecklynH 02:03, 16 June 2008 (EDT)

: That IS the point. Jros83 23:41, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

So has anyone ever heard "'There are no atheists in foxholes' is not an argument against atheism, it's an argument against foxholes?'" I love that line (by the way I'm not an atheist). Jros83 23:41, 8 October 2008 (EDT) I'm also in the Army...