Difference between revisions of "Talk:Answers in Genesis"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(We should stop citing AiG as a source in articles)
(No difference)

Revision as of 02:45, March 21, 2007

I think we all need to agree that AiG doesn't count as a valid source to cite for Conservapedia. Having read through its site pretty thoroughly, I can say that it's an extremely biased and opinionated organization with little to no actual scientific value.-AmesG 22:45, 20 March 2007 (EDT)