Difference between revisions of "Talk:Answers in Genesis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(We should stop citing AiG as a source in articles) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 02:45, March 21, 2007
I think we all need to agree that AiG doesn't count as a valid source to cite for Conservapedia. Having read through its site pretty thoroughly, I can say that it's an extremely biased and opinionated organization with little to no actual scientific value.-AmesG 22:45, 20 March 2007 (EDT)