1,161
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − +
no edit summary
I think we all need to agree that AiG doesn't count as a valid source to cite for Conservapedia. Having read through its site pretty thoroughly, I can say that it's an extremely biased and opinionated organization with little to no actual scientific value.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 22:45, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
I think we all need to agree that AiG doesn't count as a valid source to cite for Conservapedia. Having read through its site pretty thoroughly, I can say that it's an extremely biased and opinionated organization with little to no actual scientific value.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 22:45, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
Yes we should use it! And of course it is biased - it has a conservative Christian bias!
:Yes we should use it! And of course it is biased - it has a conservative Christian bias! {{unsigned|Smile}}