Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mystery:Who Ghostwrote Obama's Books?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Maybe it would be better to cite the [http://www.amazon.com/Whats-Matter-California-Cultural-Rumbles/dp/1416531033/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1223259673&sr=1-1 Cashill book] the curren...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Maybe it would be better to cite the [http://www.amazon.com/Whats-Matter-California-Cultural-Rumbles/dp/1416531033/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1223259673&sr=1-1 Cashill book] the current cite references to present our case better? This article says that Obama isn't much of a writer, but the blog post seems to disagree. It might strengthen the case if we could work around the blog post by quoting the book. Does anyone have it (or is able to buy it)? [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 22:32, 6 October 2008 (EDT) | Maybe it would be better to cite the [http://www.amazon.com/Whats-Matter-California-Cultural-Rumbles/dp/1416531033/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1223259673&sr=1-1 Cashill book] the current cite references to present our case better? This article says that Obama isn't much of a writer, but the blog post seems to disagree. It might strengthen the case if we could work around the blog post by quoting the book. Does anyone have it (or is able to buy it)? [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 22:32, 6 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | :I think a much stronger case should be made that a ghost may have been involved before asserting the books were ghostwritten and then trying to figure out who the anonymous professional might have been. In other words, this non-encyclopedic "article" runs too far ahead of itself to be any more than an unsubstantiated attempt at a personal slur. [[User:Human|Human]] 17:01, 11 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:01, October 11, 2008
Maybe it would be better to cite the Cashill book the current cite references to present our case better? This article says that Obama isn't much of a writer, but the blog post seems to disagree. It might strengthen the case if we could work around the blog post by quoting the book. Does anyone have it (or is able to buy it)? LiamG 22:32, 6 October 2008 (EDT)
- I think a much stronger case should be made that a ghost may have been involved before asserting the books were ghostwritten and then trying to figure out who the anonymous professional might have been. In other words, this non-encyclopedic "article" runs too far ahead of itself to be any more than an unsubstantiated attempt at a personal slur. Human 17:01, 11 October 2008 (EDT)