Difference between revisions of "Debate:Was the media attention needed?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I discovered Conservapedia from the media but it has also seems to have attracted unwanted attention. Do you think we really needed all that coverage? --[[User:Eiyuu Kou|Eiyuu Kou]] 23:03, 20 March 2007 (EDT) | I discovered Conservapedia from the media but it has also seems to have attracted unwanted attention. Do you think we really needed all that coverage? --[[User:Eiyuu Kou|Eiyuu Kou]] 23:03, 20 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| − | == It was needed to spread the | + | == It was needed to spread the word of an alternative to Wikipedia == |
I'm sorry... the what? [[User:Myk|Myk]] 23:26, 20 March 2007 (EDT) | I'm sorry... the what? [[User:Myk|Myk]] 23:26, 20 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 03:29, March 21, 2007
I discovered Conservapedia from the media but it has also seems to have attracted unwanted attention. Do you think we really needed all that coverage? --Eiyuu Kou 23:03, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
It was needed to spread the word of an alternative to Wikipedia
I'm sorry... the what? Myk 23:26, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
The attention was needed
It should have only been mentioned, not covered
No, but if it was not for it, I would not be here
Sulgran 23:27, 20 March 2007 (EDT)