Difference between revisions of "Debate:Was the media attention needed?"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I discovered Conservapedia from the media but it has also seems to have attracted unwanted attention. Do you think we really needed all that coverage? --[[User:Eiyuu Kou|Eiyuu Kou]] 23:03, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
 
I discovered Conservapedia from the media but it has also seems to have attracted unwanted attention. Do you think we really needed all that coverage? --[[User:Eiyuu Kou|Eiyuu Kou]] 23:03, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
  
−
== It was needed to spread the word of an alternative to Wikipedia ==
+
== It was needed to spread the gospel of Conservapedia ==
 
I'm sorry... the what?  [[User:Myk|Myk]] 23:26, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
 
I'm sorry... the what?  [[User:Myk|Myk]] 23:26, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
 
: I think it just made YEC viewpoints get mocked further.  Look at the articles, who could blame them.  --[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 23:30, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
 
: I think it just made YEC viewpoints get mocked further.  Look at the articles, who could blame them.  --[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 23:30, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::The word that Gospel is from in the greek can mean "good news" as well, so it's not necessarily a bible thing :-). "It was needed to spread the ''good news'' of Conservapedia" --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 23:30, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
  
 
== The attention was needed ==
 
== The attention was needed ==

Revision as of 03:30, March 21, 2007

I discovered Conservapedia from the media but it has also seems to have attracted unwanted attention. Do you think we really needed all that coverage? --Eiyuu Kou 23:03, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

It was needed to spread the gospel of Conservapedia

I'm sorry... the what? Myk 23:26, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

I think it just made YEC viewpoints get mocked further. Look at the articles, who could blame them. --AmesG 23:30, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
The word that Gospel is from in the greek can mean "good news" as well, so it's not necessarily a bible thing :-). "It was needed to spread the good news of Conservapedia" --Ymmotrojam 23:30, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

The attention was needed

It should have only been mentioned, not covered

No, but if it was not for it, I would not be here

Sulgran 23:27, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

Conservapedia shouldn't have had any media coverage for the sake of protecting pages