| | :::Errr... isn't that what we had after eljoe reposted it? [[User:Myk|Myk]] 01:13, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | | :::Errr... isn't that what we had after eljoe reposted it? [[User:Myk|Myk]] 01:13, 21 March 2007 (EDT) |
| | ::::And yes, something more than ideology is bothering me. List the facts, avoid speculation, let people find their own truth. Did Giuliani receive a deferment? Yes. Did he serve in the military? No... but people are smart and when they see no military record and the fact that he received a deferment, they'll figure it out? Was he rebuked by a firefighter's union? Yes. Does that union have a Democratic trend? Also, yes. Reporting the speculation of a Giuliani employee as to the possible motivations of rebuke, however, is not encyclopedic, even if it is reported by Bloomberg news. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 01:18, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | | ::::And yes, something more than ideology is bothering me. List the facts, avoid speculation, let people find their own truth. Did Giuliani receive a deferment? Yes. Did he serve in the military? No... but people are smart and when they see no military record and the fact that he received a deferment, they'll figure it out? Was he rebuked by a firefighter's union? Yes. Does that union have a Democratic trend? Also, yes. Reporting the speculation of a Giuliani employee as to the possible motivations of rebuke, however, is not encyclopedic, even if it is reported by Bloomberg news. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 01:18, 21 March 2007 (EDT) |
| | + | *The article now notes he did not serve in the Military, and the portion of his reply to the union, speculating on its political motivation is removed, allowing the readers to decide. Now, all of your issues seem to have been dealt with. --~ [[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|Talk2Me!]]</sup> 01:24, 21 March 2007 (EDT) |