Difference between revisions of "Talk:Homo sapiens"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservateur (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Not really according to most geographers I have talked to. Usually inhabiting means having people living there all thi time in the form of family units, towns, cities and the like. | Not really according to most geographers I have talked to. Usually inhabiting means having people living there all thi time in the form of family units, towns, cities and the like. | ||
-Gasmonkey | -Gasmonkey | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Two Homo sapiens articles == | ||
| + | There are two separate articles on this subject, [[Homo Sapiens]] and [[Homo sapiens]]. The lower case sapiens is the correct form, so we should merge the other one here.--[[User:Conservateur|Conservateur]] 01:45, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 05:45, March 21, 2007
Creationist View?
Can we add the creationist view on "Homo Sapiens?"
- Yes, but keep it neutral.--Elamdri 19:48, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
Antarctica
There are permanent bases on Antarctica. Wouldn't that mean we inhabit all seven continents? --Dave3172 10:53, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
Not really according to most geographers I have talked to. Usually inhabiting means having people living there all thi time in the form of family units, towns, cities and the like. -Gasmonkey
Two Homo sapiens articles
There are two separate articles on this subject, Homo Sapiens and Homo sapiens. The lower case sapiens is the correct form, so we should merge the other one here.--Conservateur 01:45, 21 March 2007 (EDT)