Difference between revisions of "Talk:Abner Louima"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(reply) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Rectum penetrated with a broomstick is not sexual assault. --'''<font color="#6698FF">J</font><font color="#E41B17">p</font><font color="#F88017">a</font><font color="#347C17">t</font><font color="#A74AC7">t</font>'''<sup>[[User:Jpatt| ]]</sup> 16:51, 22 October 2008 (EDT) | Rectum penetrated with a broomstick is not sexual assault. --'''<font color="#6698FF">J</font><font color="#E41B17">p</font><font color="#F88017">a</font><font color="#347C17">t</font><font color="#A74AC7">t</font>'''<sup>[[User:Jpatt| ]]</sup> 16:51, 22 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
:What would you classify it as? In NYC it was viewed as a form of prison rape, but committed by the officer instead of an inmate. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 16:53, 22 October 2008 (EDT) | :What would you classify it as? In NYC it was viewed as a form of prison rape, but committed by the officer instead of an inmate. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 16:53, 22 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::It is aggravated assault. The same would be said if he was penetrated by a knife.--'''<font color="#6698FF">J</font><font color="#E41B17">p</font><font color="#F88017">a</font><font color="#347C17">t</font><font color="#A74AC7">t</font>'''<sup>[[User:Jpatt| ]]</sup> 17:02, 22 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:02, October 22, 2008
Rectum penetrated with a broomstick is not sexual assault. --Jpatt 16:51, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
- What would you classify it as? In NYC it was viewed as a form of prison rape, but committed by the officer instead of an inmate. --DinsdaleP 16:53, 22 October 2008 (EDT)