Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pearl Jam"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Ok, I'm sure I'm walking into the saw blades here, but how is (or was) this article obscene?  Am I just missing something maybe?  [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 16:58, 25 October 2008 (EDT)
 
Ok, I'm sure I'm walking into the saw blades here, but how is (or was) this article obscene?  Am I just missing something maybe?  [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 16:58, 25 October 2008 (EDT)
 
:Liam, you're not walking into blades with me. Perhaps Google, or a book of words used in cities might help. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 17:02, 25 October 2008 (EDT)
 
:Liam, you're not walking into blades with me. Perhaps Google, or a book of words used in cities might help. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 17:02, 25 October 2008 (EDT)
 +
::Ok, so I followed the clues and figured it out (only through the second or third page of that "book") but google just brings up the band - which is extremely well-known and what this article was about. Is it really necessary to delete an article about a famous and influential band because someone somewhere uses the band's name as some sort of obscenity (a definition that I actively had to hunt for and wouldn't have found without you bringing it up and guiding me to it)?  I don't see the point in that.  [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 17:09, 25 October 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 21:09, October 25, 2008

Ok, I'm sure I'm walking into the saw blades here, but how is (or was) this article obscene? Am I just missing something maybe? LiamG 16:58, 25 October 2008 (EDT)

Liam, you're not walking into blades with me. Perhaps Google, or a book of words used in cities might help. Bugler 17:02, 25 October 2008 (EDT)
Ok, so I followed the clues and figured it out (only through the second or third page of that "book") but google just brings up the band - which is extremely well-known and what this article was about. Is it really necessary to delete an article about a famous and influential band because someone somewhere uses the band's name as some sort of obscenity (a definition that I actively had to hunt for and wouldn't have found without you bringing it up and guiding me to it)? I don't see the point in that. LiamG 17:09, 25 October 2008 (EDT)