Changes

Line 777: Line 777:     
::::: I didn't realise that Superman was an editor in control of Wikipedia.  In about the last four minutes, there's been about 500 changes to Wikipedia (about two edits per second) so I have trouble understanding how they could possibly even read the recent changes list, let alone check out every edit.  So no, although I totally agree that there is "liberal" bias at Wikipedia, this is not a clear example of it.  On the contrary, it's a lousy example of it.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:31, 26 October 2008 (EDT)
 
::::: I didn't realise that Superman was an editor in control of Wikipedia.  In about the last four minutes, there's been about 500 changes to Wikipedia (about two edits per second) so I have trouble understanding how they could possibly even read the recent changes list, let alone check out every edit.  So no, although I totally agree that there is "liberal" bias at Wikipedia, this is not a clear example of it.  On the contrary, it's a lousy example of it.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:31, 26 October 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
== If you think wikipedia is biased towards liberals... ==
 +
 +
Why don't you work to fix it? It's nobody's fault but your own, because instead of actively going out and making changes to wikipedia (which is the point of wikipedia), you just sit on your dicks and complain about it.
9

edits