Difference between revisions of "Talk:Google"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(liberal bias) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::"And he hath filled him with the spirit of God, in wisdom, in understanding, and in knowledge, and in all manner of workmanship;" (Exodus 35:31) | ::"And he hath filled him with the spirit of God, in wisdom, in understanding, and in knowledge, and in all manner of workmanship;" (Exodus 35:31) | ||
:[[User:JC|JC]] 11:02, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | :[[User:JC|JC]] 11:02, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | If no one can find a citation for the liberal bias soon then yes, it should be removed. --[[User:JamesK|JamesK]] 11:06, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:06, March 21, 2007
Can this be that same Google which submitted willingly to censorship by the oppressive, godless, communist regime in China? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cas194 (talk)
- I think you probably would too if it put an extra $50 million straight into your pocket. Besides, most internet-savvy Chinese are good at using Proxies. --Hojimachongtalk 21:22, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
Google has a liberal bias? That's like accusing a hammer or a wrench of having a liberal bias; The google search engine is just a tool. -- Todd
Ya i agree with Todd. Sounds funny that a search engine has liberal bias on it. i think that needs to be taken out. --Will N. 11:01, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
- If the hammer or wrench is causing damage to something conservative then it has a liberal bias.
- "And he hath filled him with the spirit of God, in wisdom, in understanding, and in knowledge, and in all manner of workmanship;" (Exodus 35:31)
- JC 11:02, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
If no one can find a citation for the liberal bias soon then yes, it should be removed. --JamesK 11:06, 21 March 2007 (EDT)