Difference between revisions of "User talk:NewCrusader"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
Just for the record, I was blocked by DeanS for one week for reason 'Parodist' following my edits to the article on [[Satan]]. I'm not sure why this is, looking back at my edits, I made three very minor changes, all of which look acceptable.
 
Just for the record, I was blocked by DeanS for one week for reason 'Parodist' following my edits to the article on [[Satan]]. I'm not sure why this is, looking back at my edits, I made three very minor changes, all of which look acceptable.
 +
 +
== Debate: Do we put enough emphasis on homosexuality? ==
 +
 +
I thought you'd like to know that "Debate: Do we put enough emphasis on homosexuality?" is back open for business, at Rat ion alWiki. --[[User:Martina|Martina]] 17:30, 29 October 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 21:30, October 29, 2008

Block reason

You have been blocked for subverting the spam filter and your inappropriate comments have been reverted. Remember, this is a "family friendly" encyclopedia and you must follow these rules. --DeanStalk 17:17, 5 July 2008 (EDT)

My appologies. I merely considered it odd that the word 'anal' was blocked, considering the debate topic was discussing the level to which Conservapedia should self-censor, and made use of a temporary workaround until the issue could be addressed. I also found it confusing that I was unable to use a word which several other commenters had used previously.
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ (four tildes) or use the signature button on the toolbar above the editbox (10th button from left). BrianCo 11:49, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
Ah, so that's how to do it! I've been trying to figure that out... I knew there was some type of sequence. Thanks... and testing: NewCrusader 12:42, 17 August 2008 (EDT)

Satan Block

Just for the record, I was blocked by DeanS for one week for reason 'Parodist' following my edits to the article on Satan. I'm not sure why this is, looking back at my edits, I made three very minor changes, all of which look acceptable.

Debate: Do we put enough emphasis on homosexuality?

I thought you'd like to know that "Debate: Do we put enough emphasis on homosexuality?" is back open for business, at Rat ion alWiki. --Martina 17:30, 29 October 2008 (EDT)