Debate:Natural Disaster versus Act of God

This is about language and it's proper usage. I created an article about Natural Disasters saying:

'Natural disaster is an atheist term for an Act of God. The term describes Acts of God as something that happens 'naturally' not by the will of our creator and thereby denies the influence of our own behavior.'

It was instantly replaced by this stuff:

'A natural disaster is a disaster caused by natural forces, as in, a volcano, or a hurricane. Some simply call a "natural disaster" an Act of God [1].'

I think there is still to much of a liberal bias in here.--Sherman 11:57, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

A bias against logical errors is not a liberal bias. It's a factual bias as you can see[1].

So where is the 'logical error'? And by the way: it's good form to sign your post.--Sherman 12:12, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

So your saying that when a sunami hits and kills hundreds of thousands of people, it's because your " creator" caused it, an " Act of God ". I guess that would make your creator the biggest mass and serial murder in history, given all the acts of god that have killed millions of people.

Dear 'Anonymus': That's what you make of it. The flood happened and god had no doubts whether people were 'good' od 'bad'. Why is it so hard to understand?--Sherman 12:40, 21 March 2007 (EDT)