Difference between revisions of "Talk:Idiom"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Concise)
 
(There are quite a lot of idioms. Are you sure they should be compiled into one article, rather than leaving them in a category?)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I plan to gather the idioms that have been written into separate articles and compile them all here. Having to skip through each and every page to find the idioms might boost pageviews but also gets in the way of conciseness. [[User talk:MargeryCampbell|Marge]] 17:54, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 
I plan to gather the idioms that have been written into separate articles and compile them all here. Having to skip through each and every page to find the idioms might boost pageviews but also gets in the way of conciseness. [[User talk:MargeryCampbell|Marge]] 17:54, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 +
: There are [http://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Category:English_idioms&from=all+and+sundry quite a lot of idioms].  Are you sure they should be compiled into one article, rather than leaving them in a category?  --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 11:56, 4 November 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 16:56, November 4, 2008

I plan to gather the idioms that have been written into separate articles and compile them all here. Having to skip through each and every page to find the idioms might boost pageviews but also gets in the way of conciseness. Marge 17:54, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

There are quite a lot of idioms. Are you sure they should be compiled into one article, rather than leaving them in a category? --Interiot 11:56, 4 November 2008 (EST)