7
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 22:
Line 22: − + + + + + + + + + + + +
→NHS inaccuracy: new section
:::I added it. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 19:23, 8 August 2007 (EDT)
:::I added it. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 19:23, 8 August 2007 (EDT)
It's pretty sad when you call the film biased; when you're review is even more biased. Even if you didn't like, at least '''try''' to seem like you see both side of the arguement.
==Bias?==
It's pretty sad when you call the film biased; when you're review is even more biased. Even if you didn't like, at least '''try''' to seem like you see both sides of the arguement.
:Do you realize this is a [[conservative]] website? We are <u>not</u> going to have a NPOV. Of course, the film has a [[liberal]] bias, as does the filmmaker. You should not be surprised to see a conservative analysis here. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 18:21, 10 August 2007 (EDT)
I agree with Crocoite, the only bias there is the liberal bias. Conservapedia has no responsibility to represent their falsehood. --[[User:BiancaW|BiancaW]] 18:30, 30 June 2008 (EDT)
== NHS inaccuracy ==
"in fact NHS policies vary between the four constituent countries of the UK" -this is completely inaccurate, NHS policy is the same all over the UK.
Also for clarity prescription charges are a flat fee of £6.85 regardless of what the drug costs. NHS dentists are heavily subsidised and only a nominal fee is charged (although if you are unemployed or elderly you are not charged).