7
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 22:
Line 22: + + + + + + + + + + +
→NHS inaccuracy: new section
:::I added it. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 19:23, 8 August 2007 (EDT)
:::I added it. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 19:23, 8 August 2007 (EDT)
==Bias?==
It's pretty sad when you call the film biased; when you're review is even more biased. Even if you didn't like, at least '''try''' to seem like you see both sides of the arguement.
It's pretty sad when you call the film biased; when you're review is even more biased. Even if you didn't like, at least '''try''' to seem like you see both sides of the arguement.
:Do you realize this is a [[conservative]] website? We are <u>not</u> going to have a NPOV. Of course, the film has a [[liberal]] bias, as does the filmmaker. You should not be surprised to see a conservative analysis here. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 18:21, 10 August 2007 (EDT)
I agree with Crocoite, the only bias there is the liberal bias. Conservapedia has no responsibility to represent their falsehood. --[[User:BiancaW|BiancaW]] 18:30, 30 June 2008 (EDT)
== NHS inaccuracy ==
"in fact NHS policies vary between the four constituent countries of the UK" -this is completely inaccurate, NHS policy is the same all over the UK.
Also for clarity prescription charges are a flat fee of £6.85 regardless of what the drug costs. NHS dentists are heavily subsidised and only a nominal fee is charged (although if you are unemployed or elderly you are not charged).