Difference between revisions of "Evolution by natural selection"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (categorize)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
[[Phillip E. Johnson]] told [[NOVA]]:
 
[[Phillip E. Johnson]] told [[NOVA]]:
 
:If evolution by natural selection is a scientific doctrine, then the critique of that doctrine, and even of the fundamental [[assumption]] on which it's based, is a legitimate part of [[science]] as well. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/defense-id.html Intelligent Design on Trial - In Defense of Intelligent Design]
 
:If evolution by natural selection is a scientific doctrine, then the critique of that doctrine, and even of the fundamental [[assumption]] on which it's based, is a legitimate part of [[science]] as well. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/defense-id.html Intelligent Design on Trial - In Defense of Intelligent Design]
 +
 +
[[Category:Evolution]]

Revision as of 22:17, November 7, 2008

Template:Stub Phillip E. Johnson told NOVA:

If evolution by natural selection is a scientific doctrine, then the critique of that doctrine, and even of the fundamental assumption on which it's based, is a legitimate part of science as well. Intelligent Design on Trial - In Defense of Intelligent Design