Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + Line 9:
Line 9: − +
Conservapedia:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 21:57, March 21, 2007
, 21:57, March 21, 2007refined
1. We do not allow gossip, just as a real encyclopedia avoids it.
1. We do not allow gossip, just as a real encyclopedia avoids it.
2. We do not allow opinions of journalists to be repeated here. Instead, we require authoritative support.
2. We do not allow opinions of journalists to be repeated here as though they are facts. Instead, we require authoritative support. Wikipedia presents as facts numerous assertions that are based merely on journalists' (biased) opinion.
3. We do not allow obscenity, while Wikipedia has many entries unsuitable for children.
3. We do not allow obscenity, while Wikipedia has many entries unsuitable for children.
5. We allow original works, while Wikipedia does not.
5. We allow original works, while Wikipedia does not.
6. We have less restrictions on the reuse of our material.
6. We have less restrictions on the reuse of our material than Wikipedia does.
7. We do not allow liberal censorship of conservative facts, while Wikipedia editors who are far more liberal than the American public are free to censor factual information.
7. We do not allow liberal censorship of conservative facts, while Wikipedia editors who are far more liberal than the American public are free to censor factual information.