Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nanotechnology"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I don't see what was wrong with them, other than a reference not being provided. Why shouldn't they be restored since they were removed without explanation?. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 09:57, 12 November 2008 (EST) | I don't see what was wrong with them, other than a reference not being provided. Why shouldn't they be restored since they were removed without explanation?. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 09:57, 12 November 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I can't speak for Ed Poor, but I'm guessing the only reason this was reverted was the lack of reference. Whenever yyou edit, please try to cite credible sources. Thanks. --[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] <sub>[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]</sub> 10:12, 12 November 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 15:12, November 12, 2008
I don't understand why you reverted my edit. The article has a stub at the end asking users to expand it. I did.
Reversion of JohnD edits
I don't see what was wrong with them, other than a reference not being provided. Why shouldn't they be restored since they were removed without explanation?. --DinsdaleP 09:57, 12 November 2008 (EST)
I can't speak for Ed Poor, but I'm guessing the only reason this was reverted was the lack of reference. Whenever yyou edit, please try to cite credible sources. Thanks. --Ben Talk 10:12, 12 November 2008 (EST)