Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7:
Line 7: − + − + − +
Conservapedia:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 23:01, March 21, 2007
, 23:01, March 21, 2007inserted "properly labeled" for original works, shifted to end
4. We do not attempt to be neutral to all points of view. We are neutral to the facts. If a group is a terrorist group, then the label "terrorist" is used here but not on Wikipedia.
4. We do not attempt to be neutral to all points of view. We are neutral to the facts. If a group is a terrorist group, then the label "terrorist" is used here but not on Wikipedia.
5. We allow original works, while Wikipedia does not.
5. We have less restrictions on the reuse of our material than Wikipedia does.
6. We have less restrictions on the reuse of our material than Wikipedia does.
6. We do not allow liberal censorship of conservative facts, while Wikipedia editors who are far more liberal than the American public are free to censor factual information. Conservapedia does not censor any facts that comport with the basic [[rules]].
7. We do not allow liberal censorship of conservative facts, while Wikipedia editors who are far more liberal than the American public are free to censor factual information. Conservapedia does not censor any facts that comport with the basic [[rules]].
7. We allow original, properly labeled works, while Wikipedia does not.