Changes

242 bytes added ,  18:02, November 15, 2008
Line 49: Line 49:  
:::Ed, I'd support reinstating this page too. It's a crazy idea to think about, turning a whole army gay, but it was a legitimately suggested (far-fetched) plan that is in the Pentagon's records. I also am not 100% sure that it's chemically impossible to do. If there are truth serums, why can't there be a gay serum? Not that I'd want it to fall in the wrong hands! -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 03:13, 15 November 2008 (EST)
 
:::Ed, I'd support reinstating this page too. It's a crazy idea to think about, turning a whole army gay, but it was a legitimately suggested (far-fetched) plan that is in the Pentagon's records. I also am not 100% sure that it's chemically impossible to do. If there are truth serums, why can't there be a gay serum? Not that I'd want it to fall in the wrong hands! -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 03:13, 15 November 2008 (EST)
 
::::Largely because that implies there is some sort of chemical reason for "gayness", which I don't think has ever been shown. There are chemical inhibitors, and truth serums supress those in order to get the truth out. But I still agree that this article wasn't parody, or at least, it was about a true subject. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 12:48, 15 November 2008 (EST)
 
::::Largely because that implies there is some sort of chemical reason for "gayness", which I don't think has ever been shown. There are chemical inhibitors, and truth serums supress those in order to get the truth out. But I still agree that this article wasn't parody, or at least, it was about a true subject. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 12:48, 15 November 2008 (EST)
 +
:::::I see it's been undeleted! (That's what I get for going through my watchlist in strict order). Joaquín wrote it, so it definitely wasn't started as parody. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 13:02, 15 November 2008 (EST)
5,580

edits