Difference between revisions of "Paul Cameron"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(1 out of 9 HIV-positive gays lied about it and put another person at risk)
(any specific flaws in his published peer-reviewed scientific papers?)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
* "Scientists besides myself have noted the addiction to falsehood and deception that is characteristic of homosexuals."<ref> [http://www.familyresearchinst.org/FRI_APA-rebuttal.html APA Rebuttal by Dr. Paul Cameron]</ref>
 
* "Scientists besides myself have noted the addiction to falsehood and deception that is characteristic of homosexuals."<ref> [http://www.familyresearchinst.org/FRI_APA-rebuttal.html APA Rebuttal by Dr. Paul Cameron]</ref>
 
* Among those who knew that they had the AIDS virus, "11% have said or implied that they were HIV-negative in order to have sex."
 
* Among those who knew that they had the AIDS virus, "11% have said or implied that they were HIV-negative in order to have sex."
 +
 +
==Unprofessional responses from organizations==
 +
 +
The APA and ASA have issued statements denouncing Cameron for holding positions contrary to theirs. They have not, however, pointed out any specific flaws in his published peer-reviewed scientific papers. So it is patently obvious that they are trying to suppress his findings for political reasons (see [[politicized science]]).
  
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
 
<references />
 
<references />

Revision as of 15:27, November 19, 2008

Paul Cameron is a scientist who has presented disturbing information about homosexual behavior in the United States. Professional associations have responded by making vague, unsupported accusations about his personal character.

Homosexual behavior

  • "Scientists besides myself have noted the addiction to falsehood and deception that is characteristic of homosexuals."[1]
  • Among those who knew that they had the AIDS virus, "11% have said or implied that they were HIV-negative in order to have sex."

Unprofessional responses from organizations

The APA and ASA have issued statements denouncing Cameron for holding positions contrary to theirs. They have not, however, pointed out any specific flaws in his published peer-reviewed scientific papers. So it is patently obvious that they are trying to suppress his findings for political reasons (see politicized science).

Notes