Difference between revisions of "Academic freedom"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (wikify)
(the free exchange of ideas ... is vital to the purpose and proper functioning of higher education)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''Academic freedom''' is defined by [[Merriam-Webster]] as "freedom to teach or to learn without interference (as by government officials)."<ref>http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/academic%20freedom Merriam-Webster.com</ref>
 
'''Academic freedom''' is defined by [[Merriam-Webster]] as "freedom to teach or to learn without interference (as by government officials)."<ref>http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/academic%20freedom Merriam-Webster.com</ref>
 +
 +
{{quotation|America’s universities traditionally have been considered
 +
places where the free exchange of ideas—academic freedom,
 +
in short—is not only welcome but, indeed, vital to
 +
the purpose and proper functioning of higher education. [http://www.thefire.org/pdfs/free-speech-2.pdf] }}
  
 
==Academic freedom crisis==
 
==Academic freedom crisis==

Revision as of 13:44, November 23, 2008

Academic freedom is defined by Merriam-Webster as "freedom to teach or to learn without interference (as by government officials)."[1]

America’s universities traditionally have been considered

places where the free exchange of ideas—academic freedom, in short—is not only welcome but, indeed, vital to

the purpose and proper functioning of higher education. [1]

Academic freedom crisis

In America, there is a strong liberal bias in schools, colleges, and universities. In addition to this, opponents of liberalism and Marxism are often censored, ridiculed, and humiliated.

Neoconservative figure David Horowitz is the founder of Students for Academic Freedom, an organization whose aim is "to end the political abuse of the university and to restore integrity to the academic mission as a disinterested pursuit of knowledge."[2]. This organization has chapters in various schools.[3]

Several states have proposed bills and resolutions aimed to end the academic freedom crisis.[4]

Constitutional Right?

A few decisions suggest that academic freedom is a constitutional right implied by the First Amendment and reserved by the Ninth Amendment. See Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 603 (1967). But such a right is "ill-defined and the case law defining it is inconsistent." Hillis v. Stephen F. Austin State University, 665 F.2d 547, 553 (5th Cir. 1982). Perhaps this right protects only the educational process itself. See id.; see also Keyishian, 385 U.S. at 603; NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415, 433 (1963).

References

See also

External links