Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rugby (sport)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::I am going to forge ahead regardless of what others say. Hopefully my work is appreciated.--[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 15:51, 14 July 2008 (EDT) | ::I am going to forge ahead regardless of what others say. Hopefully my work is appreciated.--[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 15:51, 14 July 2008 (EDT) | ||
:::Sorry about that. (Why are they on the same page anyway?) [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 17:19, 24 November 2008 (EST) | :::Sorry about that. (Why are they on the same page anyway?) [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 17:19, 24 November 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::That's Ok. For some reason there's a page for "rugby (sport)", rugby union, and rugby league. I don't really understand why! [[User:JimP|JimP]] 17:22, 24 November 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 22:22, November 24, 2008
Rugby union
The rugby union link just re-directs to Rugby while there is an article on rugby league. Does anyone know if there was an article on rugby union perhaps under a different name that has been orphaned? Otherwise I'll create one. Ajkgordon 11:24, 12 October 2007 (EDT)
- I plan on doing some work on this article now, a nice uncontroversial article I know a lot about. However I will make the article about rugby union and another one on rugby league. It is understandable perhaps that a primarily US website would lump the two sports together but its rather silly also.--DamianJohn 15:59, 13 July 2008 (EDT)
- I am going to forge ahead regardless of what others say. Hopefully my work is appreciated.--DamianJohn 15:51, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
- Sorry about that. (Why are they on the same page anyway?) AlanE 17:19, 24 November 2008 (EST)
- I am going to forge ahead regardless of what others say. Hopefully my work is appreciated.--DamianJohn 15:51, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
- That's Ok. For some reason there's a page for "rugby (sport)", rugby union, and rugby league. I don't really understand why! JimP 17:22, 24 November 2008 (EST)